Modus vivendi is liberal toleration adapted to the historical fact of pluralism. How will aging and shrinking societies that need immigrants … I argue that John Gray's modus vivendi-based justification for liberalism is preferable to the more orthodox deontological or teleological justificatory strategies, at least because of the way it can deal with the problem of diversity. But then I show how that is not good news for liberalism, for grounding liberal political authority in a modus vivendi undermines liberalism’s aspiration to occupy a privileged normative position vis-à-vis other kinds of regimes. Migration and the global media have mixed up all the old cultures into a hybrid brew.
Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. The most fundamental value-pluralist claim is that there are many conflicting kinds of human flourishing, some of which cannot be compared in value. Amazon.in - Buy Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice book online at best prices in India on Amazon.in. A polity is grounded in a modus vivendi (MV) when its main features can be presented as the outcome of a virtually unrestricted bargaining process. Is MV compatible with the consensus-based account of liberal legitimacy, i.e. Modus Vivendi Liberalism as a whole provides a valuable contribution to existing literature, is a starting point for future interdisciplinary research, and should stimulate a great deal of significant debate and discussion. So modus vivendi can save liberalism from moralism, but at cost many liberals will not be prepared to pay.
Free delivery on qualified orders. Modus Vivendi Liberalism book. But then I Moreover, whilst Rawls envisages the modus vivendi as giving way to a stable consensus that excludes divisive issues from the political agenda (p. 148), this schema regards acceptance of the principles of political decision making as being at least partly dependent on the continued existence of a fair division of power that makes compromise a virtue. Read Modus Vivendi Liberalism: Theory and Practice book reviews & author details and more at Amazon.in.
This chapter argues that the opposition between these two sets of views—liberal moralism and modus vivendi politics—has been misconceived. On the one hand, it argues that liberal moralists have failed both to accurately characterize and to adequately appreciate the importance of modus vivendi arrangements for political order.
The ethical theory underpinning modus vivendi is value-pluralism.